HZ-5980/7 · 289 scanned pages · December 1970‎–‎January 1972

The Jarring file: “on no account should we settle for passivity”

His working file on the mission of Gunnar Jarring, the UN Secretary-General’s envoy, from December 1970 to January 1972. About fifteen documents in the file are his own; his name is on the distribution of almost every cable in it. Until December 1971 he signs as Assistant Director-General, and on 16 January 1972 as “the Director-General”.

Scan: Israel State Archives, file HZ-5980/7 ↗. One page of the file’s 289 is shown here; the file itself is kept at the Archives.

A typed memorandum on Foreign Ministry letterhead, restricted, no. 180, Jerusalem, 3 January 1971, to the Foreign Minister, from M. Gazit, Assistant Director-General, with three numbered paragraphs
3 January 1971: his memorandum to the Foreign Minister, “From: M. Gazit, Assistant Director-General”

What the file shows, in the words on the page

December 1970

Chairman of the working group

A secret memorandum to the Foreign Minister, , headed “ – the working group”: “The working group met in its full composition: Messrs T. Meron, M. Sasson, M. Elizur, H. and the undersigned (chairman).” The group met on 23 December, ahead of the renewal of the Jarring talks.

He attached a proposal for “a timetable for achieving a peace treaty”, “based on an idea of ”, and noted: “The working-out of the memorandum and its detail were done by me” (site translations).

31 December 1970

Giving the Egyptians a pretext not to shoot

A memorandum to the Foreign Minister, “The talks – notes on the tactical and procedural approach”, over his signature. Egypt was then threatening not to extend the ceasefire. “If the Egyptians are looking for a pretext to say that ‘the conditions have been met’ that allow them not to open fire”, he wrote, “we must give them something for such a pretext to hold on to” (site translation).

3 January 1971

“In a vacuum”

Submitting the group’s ideas to the Minister, he wrote plainly about their limits: “The tactical ideas raised in the attached paper were worked out without an explicit directive. They were therefore formed, to a large extent, in a vacuum.” Without a government decision, he added, the group could form only “procedural and tactical thoughts”: “We do not for a moment make the mistake of thinking that this is a real substitute for what is needed” (site translations).

6 December 1971

“And that is an understatement”: what he thought of Jarring

A memorandum marked “restricted” to the Foreign Minister, , over his handwritten signature, copied to the Director-General and to the ambassadors in Washington and at the UN. It opens without preamble: “I have been arguing for many months that has shown very little diplomatic talent (and that is an understatement).”

He attached a ten-point analysis of the envoy’s moves, and warned that when Jarring returned to action, “we shall very soon be dealing with a mediocre diplomat, so lacking in imagination that it is dangerous to negotiate through him and under his auspices.”

The sharpness is deliberate, and he says so himself: a memorandum “worded in the accepted diplomatic language” would follow, but “so as not to lose time I have meanwhile dictated the abridged analysis”. This is an internal memorandum to the Minister, not a statement to the press.

Israel was then speaking of its readiness to return to the talks, and Gazit, who was responsible for the file, saw it as his duty to tell the Minister plainly whom it would be dealing with.

The diagnosis is followed at once by a practical proposal: “to fight Jarring over every step (in the manner of ‘Who is wise? He who foresees what is coming’, that is, by ‘preventive diplomacy’). On no account should we settle for passivity and a method of ‘trust Gunnar’.”

And at the end he proposed discussing it with the Americans too, “at the working level” (site translations).

16 January 1972

The Director-General passes on the line

A secret letter to the ambassador at the UN, , “From: the Director-General”. In it Gazit passes on remarks he heard from the Prime Minister, : “We must approach the contacts in complete sobriety: Jarring will not bring us peace.”

Even so his invitations should be accepted and he should be spoken to courteously: “That is the line and nothing is to be added to it.” Then he added a point of his own: Israel would see “a most negative development” if it turned out that ’s slogan, “only Jarring”, also covered the efforts for a Canal arrangement (site translations).

On this site: chapters that draw on this file

Back to the reading room: all the files that were read