HZ-5980/11 · 67 scanned pages · 1973‎–‎1975

The Prime Minister’s personal channels: Bonn and Tehran

The Archives’ catalogue calls the file “The Prime Minister’s messages, 73–75”: personal correspondence from the Director-General’s bureau about the Prime Minister’s messages, with two heads of mission, the Ambassador in Bonn and the envoy in Tehran. Two letters of his show how the personal channels of the Prime Minister, Golda Meir, were run, and how he wrote to colleagues.

Scan: Israel State Archives, file HZ-5980/11 ↗. One page of the file’s 67 is shown here; the file itself is kept at the Archives.

A typed page marked personal, to Mr Uri Lubrani, Tehran, opening “Dear Uri”, with the name Mordechai Gazit at the foot and a one-line postscript
1 December 1973: “Dear Uri”, the letter to Uri Lubrani in Tehran

What the file shows, in the words on the page

26 August 1973

The special channel to Brandt

A letter marked “personal – secret” to Israel’s Ambassador in Bonn, , “from: the Director-General”. In it Gazit explains how the Prime Minister sees the channel: “The Prime Minister believes that ’s proposal, during his visit here, to set up a special channel is of importance.”

The condition is that the exchange of letters be kept secret, “their content and their very existence”. Then three rules: when a letter goes in a sealed envelope, and when the Ambassador receives a copy.

And the ending, almost an apology: “Were we not afflicted with the plague of leaks, it would have been possible to pull the strap a little less tight, but for the time being it cannot be loosened, and the Prime Minister relies on your cooperation” (site translations).

1 December 1973

“All the circles of hell of the approvals”

A letter marked “personal” to in Tehran, five weeks after the war. Lubrani, who opened his own letter “To Motke, warm greetings”, had commented on the wording of a message from the Prime Minister to , and proposed another.

Gazit answered without defending himself: “You may well be right. The first draft was prepared by a method that cannot serve as a model or an example. I touched it up a little, otherwise you would surely have been even more shocked.”

And then, on how a prime minister’s letter gets corrected: “Simply so as not to put the new message through all the circles of hell of the approvals here (all the more as I have no time for it), I made corrections on the first page only” (site translations).

Back to the reading room: all the files that were read