HZ-5983/1 · 63 scanned pages · May 1962

Shimon Peres’s visit to Washington: the report to the Foreign Minister

The embassy’s file on the visit of Deputy Defence Minister Shimon Peres to Washington in May 1962. It opens with a four-page summary report “From: the Minister, Washington” to the Foreign Minister, Golda Meir, over the typed signature M. Gazit, followed by eight enclosures.

Scan: Israel State Archives, file HZ-5983/1 ↗. One page of the file’s 63 is shown here; the file itself is kept at the Archives.

A typed page marked top secret, addressees only, 29 May 1962, headed “The Deputy Defence Minister’s visit to Washington”
29 May 1962: the first page of the report, “To: the Foreign Minister, from: the Minister, Washington”

What the file shows, in the words on the page

23 May 1962

The question to Strong

The record of Peres’s lunch with , director of the Near East office at the State Department, notes: “Present: M. Gazit”.

And in the body: “Gazit asked whether Strong’s words meant that, for the American position to move, the assessments had to change in both the military and the political field, or whether a change in one of them was enough. Strong replied that a change in one of them was enough” (site translation).

According to the summary report, the record of the meetings at the State Department was written by Gazit himself.

29 May 1962

“The old truth about the United States”

In the summary report he wrote: “The talks at the Pentagon can, I think, be summed up as friendly, yet as confirming the old truth about the United States: that the Pentagon will act only after a political decision has been taken.” And he concluded: “Our assessment is that this was a timely visit and a useful one” (site translations).

Copies went to the Prime Minister, to Peres, to the Chief of Staff and to the Director-General of the Foreign Ministry.

29 May 1962

The White House, in the idiom of the Mishnah

Of the meetings at the White House he wrote that one could not speak “in one generalising sentence, because there Mr Peres met people whose fields of responsibility differ”, and went on in the Mishnah’s formula for telling cases apart: is not like General or , and those three are not like (site translation and paraphrase).

Back to the reading room: all the files that were read